Background
The Constitutions of the United Republic of Tanzania and Zanzibar provide for periodic elections by universal suffrage every five years. The fourth multi-party elections were held in October 2010 for the Parliaments and Presidents of the Union and Zanzibar. The three most recent elections following the reintroduction of multiparty politics were generally considered free and credible on the Mainland but have been problematic in Zanzibar with election-related violence (2000/2005) and allegations of registration rigging (2005). Notwithstanding, in the periods between elections, the country has taken notable steps to consolidate democracy including the revision of legislation and introduction of new laws including the Election Expenses Act 2010.
Acknowledging the centrality of credible and legitimate elections in democratic consolidation and based on the needs identified by the government, its key partners and stakeholders, the Union and Zanzibar governments (through NEC and ZEC, engaged early in the preparations for the 2010 general election. To complement the national effort, the Electoral Management Bodies (EMBs) requested the United Nations to help enhance national capacities for the preparation, management, conduct and observation of the 2010 general election.
In response, and within the framework of global UN election support including the joint EU-UNDP agreement on electoral assistance, the United Nations fielded a joint electoral Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) from the UN Department of Political Affairs/ Electoral Assistance Division and UNDP to assess the pre-electoral conditions including the political environment and to identify the challenges, constraints and needs of various actors in the electoral process. Among the key actors consulted were the EMBs, political parties, civil society organizations, the media, and development partners. Upon satisfaction of the need for UN engagement a project document for Electoral Support was developed.
The main goal of the Election Support Project 2010, which was formally inaugurated in June 2009, was to further strengthen national capacities for the implementation of free, fair and credible elections, with a focus on strengthening the national leadership of Electoral Management Bodies (EMBs) and engagement and capacities of political parties, media and other civil society, as well as national security management institutions, in contributing to this overall goal.
The project was implemented under UNDP Direct Implementation with a dedicated project management team under the leadership and full operational support of the UNDP Country Office. The project operated under the overall guidance and leadership of a high-level Steering Committee that delegated aspects of quality assurance to two Technical Committees. The total project budget of USD
28,300,000 was
funded through a multi-donor basket funding mechanism, which received contributions from Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, Finland, Norway, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, UNDP and the United Kingdom. Cost-sharing agreements signed bilaterally between UNDP and individual Development Partners detailed the contractual obligations of the parties.
Scope and Objectives:
The overall aim of the project final, independent evaluation is to assess the contribution by the UNDP Elections Support Project to the conduct of free, fair and credible elections in Tanzania and Zanzibar, as expressed in its overall goal. This will be done by examining and assessing the extent to which outputs were achieved, the contribution of outputs to project outcomes, and their likely impact, relevance and overall sustainability.
A second key objective is to examine the appropriateness of the form of assistance provided, with a view to draw lessons and make recommendations for future development cooperation around Electoral Assistance and assistance to Electoral Management Bodies in Tanzania. In meeting this objective, the evaluators will examine a range of factors, including the modality of financial support provided (through a 'basket' arrangement); the management and governance arrangements for the project; the quality, relevance and effectiveness of Technical Assistance and other services provided, project and component design, etc. Such findings will influence any assistance provided by UNDP and other development partners to the EMBs in the period between elections, as part of an electoral cycle approach, and for consideration of any support for the 2015 general election.
The evaluation period will include election-related support beginning with the fast track support for the upgrading of the Voters Registration system which was carried out under the auspices of the Deepening Democracy in Tanzania Project in 2008-9, and the full duration of the Elections Support Project from June 2009 until closure.
The Evaluation scope is focused on the following criteria:
1. Relevance (This component will count as 10% of the financial value of the full contract):
The extent to which the project design and implementation of activities was able to respond to and address:
The needs identified in the 2008 Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) by the UN Department for Political Affairs and expressed priorities by the Electoral Management Bodies and other key national stakeholders;
The mandate of UN electoral assistance and UNDP goals in Democratic Governance ;
Recommendations emerging from the 2005 elections observer reports, and related project evaluations from UNDP's assistance (2005 elections and the Deepening Democracy in Tanzania Programme, DDTP), including for example pre-election requirements for voters registration and education;
Gender disparities and differing abilities of other segments of the population to participate in elections.
2. Effectiveness (This component will count as 20% of the financial value of the full contract)
The extent to which project activities yielded expected outputs at the component level and contributed to expected outcomes, for example:
Improved and sustained capacity of the EMBs to plan and manage the elections, including notably: voter registration , pre-election procurement and logistics, voter education, facilitation of observer activities; results dissemination; handling of security arrangements; processing of complaints; operational planning.
Improved understanding of the elections process among voters (as measured by access of potential voters to voter education information);

• Improved 'balanced' coverage by the media of the elections;
• Participation of civil society;

Improved knowledge of political party officials and activists of their rights and responsibilities;
The evaluation shall examine to what extent results were achieved and endeavor to attribute any positive or negative results to the project.
3.
Efficiency (This component will count as 20% of the financial value of the full contract)
The evaluation shall further examine how economically the project used resources at its disposal, including the efficacy of the planned activities within the time frame and budget for project implementation; to what extent resources were used appropriately to produce the intended outputs; and the extent to which project funds, expertise and time were used judiciously to achieve desired project results.
4. Value for Money (This component will count as 20% of the financial value of the full contract)
The evaluators are expected to make a quantitative cost benefit analysis of select major procurements and activities to determine the extent to which;
The financial investments (cost of procurement) made were justified in light of the benefits that the project delivered, including the sustainability of results towards 2015 elections;
Procurements of products and services were conducted in pursuit of best value for money;
Project costs were justified in comparison with similar scale election support projects in other countries;
As a minimum, the evaluation shall seek to examine the value for money of:
The total investment into the Voter's registration system (noting that a bulk part of the investment was made with funding outside of the 28 MUSD channeled as fast-track through another project);
The Voter Education Grant Facility;
Large-scale procurement of elections-related materials such as ballot boxes;
The Incident Reporting and Response System (IRRS) installed with the Tanzania Police Force to support the management of elections-related violence;
At least one activity within each of the project's other components.
5. Sustainability (This component will count as 10% of the financial value of the full contract)
The extent to which the improved systems, processes, and capacities resulting from this project are likely to benefit the EMBs after the life of the project and particularly with a view to application for the next scheduled elections in 2015, as well as the
ability to adapt and use such capacity for other processes, such as potential by-elections, referendum, grassroots elections, etc. S
ustainability should be assessed in particular with regard to the following:
Improvements to the Voter's Register from 2009

• Skills and expertise development;
• Capacities for Voter Education;
• Improvements in the Media professionalization compared to 2005 elections;

Capacities for supporting a peaceful environment, including the Incident Reporting and Response System (IRRS);
Future use of other key procurements;
Overall organizational mandate and capacity of the EMBs.
6. Impact (This component will count as 20% of the financial value of the full contract)
The evaluation should seek to approximate or estimate the project's contribution to the preparations for and accomplishment of the 2010 general election.
Consider project design as well as execution, and examine ESP activities across all the six project components;
Assess the degree to which gender, capacity development, and other cross-cutting issues were effectively mainstreamed and addressed in project design and development;
Assess the design and implementation of ESP in relation to core aid effectiveness principles such as; national ownership and leadership;
Extract the lessons learned and best practices and elaborate specific recommendations to the participating partners and project stakeholders.
Duties and Responsibilities
Methodology
Baseline
The evaluators may construct a baseline on the basis of the project's M&E framework and the assumptions made therein. In addition, the final evaluation of the 2005 election support and the 2008 UN-DPA Needs Assessment Report will be other key references for comparative analysis . Other independent assessments, such as independent observers' reports from the 2005 elections, may be helpful for appreciation of the baseline.
The evaluation should use a combination of the following methods for data collection:
Document Review – three major categories of documentation will be examined:
Documents that constitute formal agreement among project partners and/or record progress; such as the ESP project document, meeting minutes, the monitoring and evaluation framework, the approved project Work Plan, periodic reports, as well as reports prepared by contractors to document the progress of their commissioned work;
Publicly available information such as opinion polls, reports from independent observers that document electoral performance (including some that were funded by the project), including e.g. reports from Media monitoring and international and domestic observer reports, documentation prepared by political parties, the courts and other interested parties during and in the immediate aftermath of the elections;
Internal working documents or other documents produced during the course of implementation, such as monitoring reports, training materials, mission reports, consultancy reports, speeches, presentations, etc. (as applicable).
The consultants may also be guided by documents describing recognized international standards for free and fair elections, in order to assess the project's results. These documents are also available in the public domain.
Key Participant Interviews – the evaluation should include interviews with key stakeholders:

• Senior management and other key focal points in NEC and ZEC;

Other national stakeholders with a mandate related to the elections (e.g. political parties, the Police, the RPP, etc.);

• Representatives of sub-contracted parties of major components;
• National electoral expert commentators, for example domestic observers
• International long-term observers in Zanzibar;

Members of the technical committees and project steering committee, representatives of project donors;

• UNDP staff and management, including key project personnel;

Quantitative/Cost-benefit analysis – the evaluation will analyze data on the cost and benefits of project results, to enable conclusions to be drawn about the project's contribution to value for money of the funds provided.
Structured surveys and semi-structured interviews – project staff and key informants no longer in the country could be approached by telephone, e-survey or both. The evaluators may also wish to use this tool for other data collection purposes.
Stakeholder Consultations – Consultations with groups of stakeholders i.e. media, CSOs, Development Partners, Political Parties, National Observer Organizations, etc.
Identification of Best Practices and lessons Learned – the evaluation shall seek to extract good practices, innovation, and other elements that deserve replication; and identify any lessons learned in support of future assistance to elections.
In conducting data analysis and presenting the findings, the evaluation should use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. While the evaluation is expected to estimate project impact, it is understood that the evidence of impact may not be available for all components; and further that the methodological rigour usually associated with impact evaluation may not be applicable to this evaluation.
Outputs and Deliverables
The evaluation team shall produce the following deliverables through the course of the assignment:
Work plan – within two days of the start of the assignment. The document will include a detailed approach and methodology, schedule, and a draft data collection protocol. In particular, the work plan will require a clear approach to data collection and work organization to examine the project in its full scope. The work plan will be evaluated by UNDP for quality and content, upon which clearance to proceed with the full evaluation will be granted.
Preliminary findings report – within 20 days of the start of the assignment, the consultants will share a draft report indicating the scope of assessment in key components for validation by UNDP and other stakeholders. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate progress on the assignment and adherence to the TORs, and will identify any evaluation issues that may need further clarification before completion of the in-country mission.
Presentation of findings, and draft evaluation report – within 28 days of the start of the assignment, a presentation of findings and preliminary recommendations to key stakeholders orally and in writing will be made at or prior to completion of the in-country mission. The purpose of this session is to provide opportunity for initial validation and support further elaboration of the evaluators' findings and recommendations. The quality of the report and draft findings will be assessed by stakeholders.
Final evaluation report – within two weeks of receiving the consolidated comments from stakeholders, the Evaluation Team will submit a final document that addresses relevant comments and provides comprehensive reporting on all elements of the assignment. This report will be submitted to the ESP Steering Committee for clearance.
A lump sum payment will be effected on the basis of fully satisfactory and timely delivery on all deliverables. The report will be considered satisfactory if it addresses all elements in the TOR and has been endorsed by the project Steering Committee, with representation of key stakeholders.
Evaluation Report Outline
As a minimum, the Evaluation Report (draft or final) shall include the following components (the exact structure of the report may be influenced by the project components and components of the Evaluation TOR):

• Executive Summary
• Introduction
• Project outline
• Methodology
• Analysis
• Findings
• Best Practices and Lessons Learned
• Recommendations
• Relevant Annexes, for example:

List of people interviewed
List of acronyms
Evaluation work plan and TOR
List of key reference documents
Time Frame for the Evaluation Process
The Evaluation is expected to start in September 2011 and have an expected total duration of 35 working days. The final work plan will be confirmed by the Evaluation Team and UNDP upon submission of a draft work plan for discussion.
Indicative Work Requirement
Orientation to the assignment, initial document review, and preparation/discussion of the Evaluation Plan (2 days)
Detailed document review at component level and interviews with key project personnel (7 days)
Stakeholder consultations, external and internal, including the preparation of surveys etc. (8 days)

• Quantitative analysis (5 days)

Analysis and preparation of draft evaluation findings (6 days)

• Debriefings (2 days)

Preparation of Final Evaluation Report, including addressing comments from the stakeholders on the first draft (5 days)
Total: 35 working days
It is expected that the mission will spend 3-4 weeks on in-country work (including domestic travel time), and that remaining time will be allocated for the production of evaluation deliverables.
Competencies
UNDP wishes to contract experienced evaluators to undertake the evaluation. The A team of at least three experts will undertake the evaluation. The Team Leader will lead, organize, and supervise the work of the evaluation team, ensuring a division of labor that is commensurate with the skills profiles of the individual team members. He or she will have overall responsibility for the production of deliverables, in particular the evaluation report, and is ultimately accountable for its quality. The Team Leader is also responsible for ensuring adequate consultations with all stakeholders and for reporting to UNDP on progress.
As a minimum requirement for the team composition, at least one of the members of the evaluation team must have demonstrated strong understanding of electoral assistance; at least one of the members must have demonstrated experience conducting independent evaluation of large-scale donor projects, at least one member must have strong knowledge of broader democratic governance issues, and at least one of the members must have demonstrated proficiency in value for money analysis.
The evaluators must not have had any involvement in the design or implementation of this elections support project and have no present affiliation with UNDP, its funding partners, electoral management bodies in Tanzania, or other key project stakeholder organizations that in any way could jeopardize their objectivity in relation to the assignment.
Contracts will be output-based and payment issued only upon delivery of satisfactory outputs.
Evaluation Principles and Ethics
The evaluation should be conducted in accordance with the principles laid out in UNDP Evaluation Policy and the principles outlined in the UNEG 'Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation'
Implementation Arrangements
The Team Leader will report to UNDP Senior Management, who will provide guidance in the development of the work plan and ensure the monitoring of satisfactory completion of evaluation deliverables. UNDP may provide office space and access to standard office services as needed. The Evaluation Team should provide their own computer and communications equipment.
In consultation with the Evaluation Team Leader and as requested, UNDP personnel will make available all relevant documentation and provide contact information to key project partners and stakeholders, and facilitate contact where needed.
Time Frame for the Evaluation Process
Required Skills and Experience
Evaluation Team Leader:
University degree in a related area (e.g. political science, international development) with minimum 15 years post-degree work experience.
Demonstrated capability as an effective evaluation manager with experience leading and conducting international development evaluation of large development projects in the area of democratic governance.
Experience from implementation or evaluation of least one election support project and familiarity with project implementation in complex multi donor-funded projects.
Experience with value for money assessment or similar cost-benefit analysis.
Strong competencies in Monitoring and Evaluation methods for development projects; knowledge of UNDP's results-based management orientation and practices.
Fluency in English and excellent oral and written communication skills.
Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa an asset.
International Expert, Democratic Governance :
At least 5 years experience in the design, implementation, management, and/or evaluation of democratization projects in developing countries including at least one election support project.
Strong knowledge in some other key areas related to democratic governance such as political parties, the media, civil society, advocacy/education, human rights, women's empowerment, legal sector , conflict prevention , and/or peace and development.
Demonstrated knowledge of capacity development methods and approaches.
Familiarity with multi donor-funded projects.
At least a Master's Degree in a relevant area with minimum 7 years post-degree work experience.
Fluency in English and excellent oral and written communication skills.
Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa an asset.
International Expert, Project Financial management:
Master's Degree in Finance or Business Administration or relevant area with minimum 5 year's post-degree work experience.
Demonstrated experience in value-for-money financial analysis.
Demonstrated knowledge and experience of project management and design and/or evaluations.
Good knowledge of monitoring and evaluation methods
Fluency in English and excellent oral and written communication skills.
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.

Area: Mtwara

Application Deadline: 05/06/2011

Position Description:

Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) is a non-for profit research and training institute whose mission is to develop and sustain a district-based health research capable of generating new knowledge and relevant information for public health policy and actions.

IHI is looking for well experienced field workers to make interviews in various regions of Tanzania. Candidates who have experience in this area of work will be give priority.

Work dates: Must have no other commitments from mid June to end August

Duties and Responsibilities

• Interview people in Lindi and Mtwara • Collect data using PDA

• Follow Standard operating procedures (SOPs) and protocols of the project

• Any other duty which may be assigned by the supervisor

Qualifications and Experience

• Ordinary secondary education and above

• Experience in field of research work

• Ability to communicate in English and Kiswahili

• A computer skill is an added advantage

• Certificate/Diploma in social/community development or related field will be an added advantage

Desired Qualities

• Preference is given to people originating from Lindi and Mtwara

• Willingness to work flexible hours

• Good team working

• Work well with members of the public

• Be able to travel extensively with long hour on the way

• May be required to work evenings or weekends

• Commitment to excellence in research

• Experience of health facility assessment

• Experience of work in the health sector

Remuneration

Attractive and competitive fee per day will be provided

Mode of Employment

A short term contract to cover the period of Survey will be provided

Application Instructions:

Interested candidates should send CV, Cover Letter, photocopy of Academic and Professional Certificates to the Email Link above or by post to:

The Human Resource Manager or Administrative Assistant
Ifakara Health Institute
Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni
P.O.Box 78373
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Area: Dar Es Salaam

Application Deadline: 06/06/2011

Position Description:

Key Responsibilities

• Promote and publicize and market in a positive way the Foundation services and all matters related to the Foundation

• Developing internal information resources and networks (knowledge management) increasingly via intranet sites

• Prepare quarterly newsletter of the Foundation

• Coordinate the preparation of reports, publications and website content

• Identify, analyze and interpret information on Civil Society with the view to package it for easy use by the staff and stakeholders of the Foundation

• Coordinate the documentation of success stories and other activities of CSOs for TV, Radio programs, magazines, newsletters and other Foundation’s publications

• Provide support in translating, writing and editing of reports and other documents

• Solicit/collect/gather relevant articles from mass media like newspapers and keep them for information sharing

• Organize press release and coordinate press conference including preparation of speech

• Perform any other duties as assigned by the supervisor

Academic qualifications and years of experience

• Master’s degree in Journalism, Mass Communication or any related qualifications

• At least 3 years of experience in Mass communication

Competences (Skills, Knowledge, and Abilities)

• Ability to communicate with people

• Excellent writing and interpersonal skills

• Public speaking and presentation skills

• Fluency in English and Kiswahili

• Computer literacy with competency in MS Office Application

Personal Attributes

In addition to the above skills and qualifications, applicants for the above positions are required to have the following attributes

• A very high level of integrity, honesty and sense of responsibility

• Ability to work under pressure and produce results

• Ability to work in a dynamic team

• Ability to self manage, achieve results, and meet deadlines

Application Instructions:

Interested applicants should send their CV, Cover Letter, copies of relevant certificates, full contact details, including telephone numbers and e-mail address, the names and contact details of three (3) professional references to the Email Link above or by post to:

The Executive Director
The Foundation for Civil Society
Haidery Plaza, 5th Floor
Upanga/ Kisutu Street
P. O. Box 7192
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre

Phone: +255 222 116 713
Area: Dar Es Salaam
Application Deadline: 14/05/2011

Position Description:

From : Daily News May 4, 2011

Reporting: Managing Director

Terms of Engagement: 3 years rotational, renewable once

Qualifications

• Holder of a post graduate Degree preferably PhD in Food Science / Food Technology/Microbiology /Biochemistry

• He /she should have research work experience of not less than 8 years in Food Science or Nutrition of which 5 should be in senior managerial positions and at least 5 publications

• Training in management is essential

Main Duties and Responsibilities

• Responsible to the Managing Director on matters concerning Food Science and Nutrition

• To undertake research relating to food processing, preservation and development

• General administration and supervision of staffs under his/her directorate

• Any other duties assigned by the Managing Director

Application Instructions:

Submit hand written application letters, CV, photocopies of relevant certificates, two current colored passport size photograph, two referees by post to:

Managing Director
Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre
P.O BOX 977
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Employed applicants should channel their applications letters to their respective employers

All applicants should be below 45 years

Area: Dar Es Salaam
Application Deadline: 30/04/2011

Position Description:

Feed The Children Tanzania is a National NGO branch of the Feed The Children International .With funding from the Embassy of Finland and Feed The Children USA .Feed The Children Tanzania has programs in Thematic Areas of Food &Nutrition, Health & Education, WASH and Livelihood development.

Responsibilities:

• Assist programming department in project management

• Assist programming department in assigned programming duties

• Provide required support for smooth data collection (for monitoring and evaluation)

• Assist in the management of filling of programming documents and records

• Assist in generating month end reports including but not limited to project progress, baseline studies, up taking rates, attendance rates, retention etc.

• Assist in preparation of monitoring and evaluation schedules and reports for the year

Qualifications and Skills:

• Bachelor’s degree in social sciences, food/nutrition, finance

• Work experience if any will be an added advantage

• Proficiency in Microsoft Office Packages

• Strong written and oral communication skills

• A personal and professional commitment to gender equality

• Age between 20 and 30 years

A stipend will be provided for interns

Application Instructions:

Interested candidates should submit their CV and Cover Letter and copy of relevant certificates including birth certificate to the Email Link above or by post to:

The Country Director
Feed the Children Tanzania
Plot No. 240 B
Mikoroshini Street, Msasani Village
P.O BOX 105408
Dar es Salaam Tanzania

All applications must be accompanied by

A one page statement of your 6 expectations/motivations/objectives you desire to achieve

In your statement please indicate the period for which you will be available to undertake this program

These positions are open only to Tanzanians who have completed their bachelor’s degree/diploma courses and are currently not employed.

Area: Kasulu in Northwestern Tanzania
Application Deadline: 11/06/2011

Position Description:

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and helps people to survive and rebuild their lives. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees forced to flee from war or disaster.

At work today in over 40 countries and 22 U.S. cities, we restore safety, dignity and hope to millions who are uprooted and struggling to endure.

The IRC leads the way from harm to home.

BACKGROUND

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) IRC Tanzania is present in the Kigoma Region, Northwestern Tanzania, providing services in two remaining refugee camps in Kasulu District and at a transit centre in Kigoma town. Approximately 36,000 Burundians and 62,000 Congolese receive protection and basic assistance in the areas of Camp Management, Child Protection, Community-based Rehabilitation (care for disabled), Vulnerable Care, Youth & Development and Gender-Based Violence.

The GBV Program seeks to improve the protection of women and girls in the Tanzania refugee camps through supporting measures to prevent GBV, raise awareness and respond to current and emerging needs through a multi-sector approach.

SCOPE OF WORK

This role will be responsible for providing technical supervision for the overall implementation of quality GBV programs during the absence of the regular GBV Manager, in compliance with donor requirements and current programming strategy. S/he will lead the GBV team, contributing technical advice on the design, implementation and monitoring of GBV programs in addition to assessments being conducted during this period. As is realistic within the timeframe, h/she will ensure that GBV staff receives appropriate mentorship and professional development and that a positive team spirit is fostered encouraging innovative and quality programming.

The temporary GBV Manager will report to the Program Coordinator (PC) based in Kasulu. Technical support is provided by the WPE Technical Advisor.

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

Program Design

• Provide technical guidance on program design and proposal development, including needs assessments and program evaluation.

Program Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation

• Support the GBV Supervisors to coordinate and monitor the quality, timely implementation, financial management and reporting of the GBV program, in compliance with donor requirements

• Identify gaps in data collection and develop tools and systems to ensure quality and consistent program monitoring

• Provide on-going direct supervision, including assisting in the development of individual work plans, for GBV staff, ensuring best practice standards are met

• Ensure timely submission of all program reports and quality of program data

• Conduct regular meetings with project staff and community members to assess progress toward objectives, discuss issues and assist in finding solutions to challenges identified

Human Resource Management and Development

• Lead GBV program staff, encouraging a positive and committed team spirit, which fosters participation and innovation from all staff

• Assess the training and capacity building needs, and advice on professional development plans, in line with organizational strategies, for GBV staff

• Conduct technical trainings in response to identified needs of GBV staff.

Communication, Coordination, Representation and Advocacy

• Collaborate with Field Coordinator and other operations Coordinators to ensure that the GBV program is properly supported and that all activities are conducted according to IRC HR, Logistics, Finance and other policies and procedures

• In coordination with the PC, promote and represent the interests of the GBV program with regards to all relevant stakeholders

• Liaise with IRC’s WPE Technical Unit and other departments as required to ensure effective and collaborative working relationships

Location, security and housing

This position will be based in Kasulu in Northwestern Tanzania, which is stable but relatively remote. The temporary GBV Manager will live in shared IRC housing in Kasulu.

Application Instructions:

Online application. To apply for this job, please go to the Website below

http://tbe.taleo.net/NA2/ats/careers/requisition.jsp?org=IRC&cws=1&rid=7013

The Swiss Cooperation (SC) in Tanzania focuses on three domains: Governance &
Accountability, Private Sector Development in Agriculture (PSD) and Well Being
(health and water). As a part of its activities, SC aims at supporting and enhancing
the role of the private sector and strengthening the economy for the benefit of the
rural poor people with a focus on improved access to markets for small and medium
scale farmers and better quality of products.

The Swiss Cooperation is looking to hire a National Advisor for Private Sector
Development in the agricultural sector who will be working both on strategic as well
as programme management level and supporting the SC Office (COOF) in the
implementation of its Tanzanian Country Programme 2011 - 2015.

Key Responsibilities
Thematic policy dialogue: Represent the Swiss Cooperation concerns and
endeavors in the field of private sector development and agriculture towards
Tanzanian and international development partners, government and non-state actors
at various levels, drawing on the agency’s cooperation activities, partnership spirit
programs and projects.
Program management: Technical, methodological and policy support to the
formulation, planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation of projects and
programs in the field of private sector development, with a particular focus on
agriculture.
Context analysis: Support the overall Swiss program development and the private
sector development domain with well documented socio-economic and political
context analysis that will advise the strategy of the Swiss cooperation program in
Tanzania in the field of private sector development in agriculture.

Qualifications and Experience
 Masters degree in Agricultural Economics, MBA-Agribusiness, Public
Administration or other relevant discipline.
 At least 10 years of professional experience in the area of Private Sector
Development and profound knowledge of the agricultural sectors.
 Extended knowledge and capacities to analyze trends in the area of (macro)
economy, but particularly in the area of Private Sector Development, trade and
economic growth in agriculture.
 Strong track record of program management (Project Cycle Management).
 Sound knowledge of the national policy environment in Tanzania, economic
growth, pro-poor policies.
 Organization of program implementation including formulating Terms of
References, defining budgets, monitoring contracts, etc.
 Excellent communication skills both written and verbal English and Kiswahili as
well as strong management, communication and coordination skills.
 Ability to work in a complex and dynamic organizational setting, in a multi-cultural
environment and delivering at tight deadlines with minimal supervision

The Swiss Cooperation Office offers:
-A challenging job in a small and highly motivated and professional team
-An interesting salary package with extra social benefits
-Continuous training and capacity building opportunities
-Tanzanian Nationals, women and men, are encouraged to apply

For the full Terms of Reference please check the website: www.swisscooperation.
admin.ch/tanzania

To apply for this position please email your CV together with a covering letter
stating why you should be considered for this position and state the reference
APSD in the subject line of the email to : daressalaam@sdc.net

The deadline for applications is 10 April 2011

www.ac‐af.com
Closing date: 11th April 2011

Location: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
*Only applicants currently resident in Dar es Salaam will be considered for this position*
Africa’s Children‐Africa’s Future (AC‐AF) is a non‐governmental organization currently operating in Canada and
Tanzania. We work with vulnerable children to allow them to realize their childhood dreams, live well
balanced lives, provide for their families and support their communities through a rights‐based framework.
Many of these children may have been orphaned as a result of AIDS and will have been identified by the
community as being particularly vulnerable. In addition, we work with the local communities to raise
awareness of HIV and AIDS. In raising awareness, we educate and encourage community members to protect
themselves against transmission, provide support and advice to those already infected, and seek to reduce
stigma and discrimination against those infected and affected. We are looking for qualified candidates for the
position of Programme Manager to lead our team in the Dar es Salaam office.

Responsibilities:
As programme manager, you will be responsible for the daily operations of all programming within Dar es
Salaam although support will be provided by the Executive Director and African Support Co‐ordinator. This will
include a mixture of field work (where you will be directly interacting with children in meetings, workshops,
and personal interviews) and office administration. You will also be expected to lead the Tanzanian‐based
team in the monitoring and evaluation of all programming activities and will be responsible for the planning
and coordination of all events undertaken within Dar es Salaam.

Essential Requirements:
A university degree in a relevant field is essential for this position. However, the successful candidate will also
be expected to be hardworking, very enthusiastic in leading their team and in their interaction with children,
flexible in their approach, and be able to cope with the pressure that this position brings. Previous experience
of working with children is essential, while experience in community development and/or HIV and AIDS is
preferable. Excellent written and spoken English and Swahili are essential as we are an international
organisation. Candidates should have a good knowledge of MS Office applications.

Remuneration:
This is a voluntary position although a monthly volunteer supplement is paid. Please note that the level of
remuneration is not high and is intended to cover the basic living costs of the successful candidate.

To Apply:
Candidates should email an application letter and CV to tanzania@ac‐af.com with the position title in the
subject line. Supplement requirements should be clearly stated in your application letter. References will be
required. The successful candidate should be available to work by the end of April at the latest.

Asylum Access Tanzania
Asylum Access is a US-based international non-profit organization dedicated to making refugee rights a reality in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Asylum Access achieves this mission by providing pro bono legal information, advice and representation directly to refugees in their first countries of refuge, and by advocating for the rights of refugees worldwide. Asylum Access Tanzania is the Tanzania office of Asylum Access and predominantly serves urban refugees in Dar es Salaam. AATZ envisions a world where refugees are seen as people with rights, not just people with needs. AATZ believes that by empowering refugees to assert their human rights, it can support the creation of effective, lasting solutions for refugees around the world.

Refugees United (RU) is an independent, non-political, non-religious NGO dedicated to helping refugees reconnect with missing family members and friends completely free of charge. To this end, RU has developed an on-line tracing tool and database at www.refunite.org, where users can create a profile and conduct a family search. AATZ and Refugees United have formed a partnership to promote the services of both organizations through a joint project. AATZ is therefore soliciting applications for the position of RU Fellow to assist with the implementation of this project.

RU Fellow Job Description
This is a full time position (Monday – Friday, 8:00AM to 5:00PM) that may require occasionally work during evenings or weekends. In the long-term future, the position may require occasional travel to refugee camps. The salary is non-negotiable: $150 U.S. per month. The position will be reviewed at the end of 2 months to determine whether the position will be increased or reduced.

Core Duties
The following is a list of core duties an applicant must be able to perform in order to meet minimum qualifications for this position:

1. Create RU Profiles
a. Discuss risks and benefits of RU profile with clients without unduly pressuring clients to use the service
b. Keep accurate logs and take responsibility for printing or revising logs as necessary
c. Plan and schedule RU profiles consistently to meet weekly and monthly project goals
d. Learn to create profiles using the RU website in Swahili, English and French (with the aid of a translated screenshot, if necessary)

2. Attend all Outreach Events
a. Assist with administrative duties related to outreach events, such as participant registration, check-in, check-out, and RU profile creation.

3. Monitor Refugee Resource Room
a. Be available to assist refugees using resources, such as computers, phones, reference books…etc., in the Refugee Resource Room.
b. Monitor refugee resource use and enforce AATZ resource use policies to minimize theft, damage and inappropriate use of resources. Ensure all resources are locked securely in the office safe at night.

4. Set up Refugee Resource Room
a. Assist with price negotiation and purchase of furniture, electronics… etc.
b. Assist with organizing the tracking of all purchases: keep accurate receipts and update Budget Tracking spreadsheets
c. Assist with electronics set-up, software installation
Preferred Duties: Dependent Upon Experience
The following is a list of duties which AATZ would prefer an applicant be able to perform. These preferred duties will be assigned to the RU Fellow only if the individual has the skills and experience necessary:

5. Assist with Planning
a. Assist in the creation of a step-by-step plan to fulfill existing project agreement requirements.
b. Participate in planning sessions to identify best practices and new outreach opportunities.
c. *Note: New ideas are welcome, however, a commitment to meeting the requirements of the existing project agreement with RU must take priority.

6. Assist with Expense Tracking
a. Take responsibility for training and reminding all AATZ staff to obtain receipts for all project purchases, and to fill out required forms
b. Input receipt amounts into Budget Tracking Spreadsheets
c. Draft and update Budget Tracking Spreadsheets for monthly reports

7. Assist with Project Management
a. Assist with recruiting, training, and managing of Refugee Ambassadors Team. This team will be a group of refugees who will spread news of RU and AATZ services to other refugees in camps or Dar es Salaam.
b. Take responsibility for communicating weekly with individual ambassadors by phone, and assisting them with problems and concerns
c. Be able to motivate and organize the team of ambassadors by leading or mediating monthly group meetings
d. Ideally, will have existing permit to access the refugee camps and willingness to occasionally travel to camps to organize and monitor Refugee Ambassador Team activities.

8. Reports
a. Assist in the drafting of sections of monthly report to RU and Asylum Access Headquarters in San Francisco.
b. Potentially take over the role of RU Project Manager in the future (6-12 months)

9. Know Your Rights Training
a. Applicants with a legal background may assist AATZ staff with training Refugee Ambassadors on legal topics, such as International Refugee Law, Tanzanian Refugee Law, Refugee Rights and Obligations, UNHCR and MHA policy…etc.

Required Competencies

1. Excellent English and Swahili language skills: Must be able to communicate clearly with both AATZ Staff and refugee clients.
a. Additional language skills in French are strongly preferred. Lingala, Kirundi or other African languages would be useful as well.

2. Comfort using computers: Must be able to use Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel to create and update project logs and expense tracking documents, and to assist refugee clients in the Resource Room. Must be able to use Outlook to regularly communicate by e-mail.
a. High degree of proficiency preferred, however, AATZ will consider applicants with a willingness and ability to learn quickly. AATZ may be willing to purchase educational software to assist RU Fellow in learning Word and Excel, and to increase typing proficiency.

3. Outstanding Organizational Skills: Must be able to keep track of scheduling, receipts, profile logs and other tasks as necessary. Must be able to assist with planning outreach events. Must be a self-starter who observes tasks that need to be completed and completes them without waiting to be told.

4. Patience and Enjoy Working with People: Must be able to comfortably and respectfully interact with large numbers of people with various backgrounds (education, religion, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender…etc.). Must interact with emotionally distressed refugees while keeping a calm, professional, and patient demeanor.

5. Team Player with Leadership Potential: Must be willing to work as a member of a team and have the judgment to know when to follow and when to lead. This position will report directly to the RU Project Manager, and also report to the Legal Services Coordinator and Country Director as necessary. This position may, in the future, also involve taking a leadership position: recruiting, training and managing the Refugee Ambassador Team.

6. Commitment to the Mission of AATZ: The purpose of Asylum Access Tanzania is to help refugees become empowered and to realize their rights. Must interact with refugees in a respectful manner and be committed to the cause of promoting refugee and human rights in Tanzania.

Application Instructions
This position is available immediately. Applications will be considered on a rolling basis. Interested applicants should prepare an application including a (1) resume, (2) short English-language writing sample (1-5 pages), and (3) cover letter addressing how the applicant meets the required competencies, and his or her ability to perform the duties described above. E-mail applications to Ms. E. Rania Rampersad, Esq., RU Project Manager, at rania@asylumaccess.org. Alternatively, applications may be delivered in person to the Asylum Access Tanzania office in Mikocheni A, off Coca Cola Road by the Osama Bajaj station. (You may call one of the office phones for more precise directions: +255 788 609 094, +255 769 609 094, +255 718 109 094.) The application deadline is Friday, 1 April 2011.

STAFF COUNSELLOR, P4
Department/ Office
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Duty Station
ARUSHA
Posting Period
4 March 2011-3 April 2011
Job Opening number
11-MED-ictr arusha as-18868-R-ARUSHA(G)
United Nations Core Values: Integrity, Professionalism, Respect for Diversity
Org. Setting and Reporting
The United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (UN-ICTR), Registry, Division of Administrative Support Services. The incumbent is under the general guidance of the Chief, Division of Administrative Support Services, and direct supervision of the Chief, Human Resources and Planning Section.
Responsibilities
Under the general guidance of the Chief, Division of Administrative Support Services (DASS) and the direct supervision of the Chief, Human Resources and Planning Section (HRPS), the Staff Counsellor develops and delivers comprehensive employee assistance services and programmes to staff members. He or she will be responsible for:
1. Staff Welfare Programmes and development of related policies, approaches, procedures and techniques;
2. Develops policy proposals addressing a broad scope of highly complex, diversified and sensitive issues encountered by staff, in order to promote their personal welfare, effectiveness and sustained productivity;
3. Participates in wide meetings of counselors, elaborates plans and monitors their implementation;
4. Addresses staff members' personal and work-related issues and concerns with utmost confidentiality, neutrality, independence and caring;
5. Provides a full range of focused counseling , assistance and support to staff members and their families to overcome situations encountered in everyday life that may have an impact on their welfare and productivity;
6. Provides advice to managers and staff on complex personnel situations, e.g. substance abuse, depression, sexual harassment, domestic violence and HIV/AIDS counseling and organizes and runs support groups in these areas;
7. Organizes or participates in response teams in situations of tragedy or trauma and provide Critical Incident Stress debriefings and other response teams in emergency situations;
8. Provides ongoing psychological support to staff by providing briefing sessions upon arrival and debriefing sessions before departure and delivers presentation on the role of the Staff Counselor;
9. Provides substantive input, research and assistance in delivery of training modules and provides stress management and other training to ICTR Staff members by training them on stress management and related topics;
10. Improve awareness of UN staff on mental health issues by developing leaflets on stress and related topics, providing psycho-social education on mental health issues to UN medical Doctors (Depression, Post-Traumatic Stress, Acute Stress Disorder etc.) and conducting awareness programs on “Alcohol Abuse”, “Suicide Prevention”, “Well-being of staff “ etc.
Competencies
Professionalism: Advanced knowledge in various fields such as employee assistance programmes, allowances and benefits and social welfare; knowledge of staff rules and regulations, personnel directives, administrative instructions, health insurance provisions relevant to the UN; excellent knowledge of ICTR mandate and policies; ability to negotiate and conciliate; ability to identify issues, formulate opinions, make conclusions and recommendations; demonstrates professional competence and mastery of subject matter; is conscientious and efficient in meeting commitments, observing deadlines and achieving results; shows persistence when faced with difficult problems or challenges; remains calm in stressful situations.
Communications: Speaks and writes clearly and effectively; listens to others, correctly interprets messages from others and responds appropriately; excellent communication skills, including the ability to produce detailed reports and presentations for a diverse consumer base; handles a large volume of correspondence;
Teamwork: Excellent interpersonal skills, including ability to operate effectively across organizational boundaries; ability to establish and maintain effective partnerships and working relations in a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity; works collaboratively with colleagues to achieve organizational goals; solicits input by genuinely valuing others' ideas and expertise; is willing to learn from others; ability to manage, supervise, coach, and develop a team.
Planning & Organizing: Ability to coordinate the work of others, work under pressure of tight and conflicting deadlines and handle multiple concurrent projects/activities; develops clear goals that are consistent with agreed strategies; identifies priority activities and assignments; adjusts priorities as required; allocates appropriate amount of time and resources for completing work;
Client Orientation: Considers all those to whom services are provided to be “clients” and seeks to see things from clients' point of view; establishes and maintains productive partnerships with clients by gaining their trust and respect; identifies clients' needs and matches them to appropriate solutions; monitors ongoing developments inside and outside the clients' environment to keep informed and anticipate problems; keeps clients informed of progress or setbacks in projects; meets timeline for delivery of products or services to client;
Commitment to Continuous Learning: Keeps abreast of new developments in own occupation/profession; actively seeks to develop oneself professionally and personally; contributes to the learning of colleagues and subordinates; shows willingness to learn from others; seeks feedback to learn and improve;
Technological Awareness: Keeps abreast of available technology; understands applicability and limitation of technology to the work of the office; actively seeks to apply technology to appropriate tasks; shows willingness to learn new technology.
Core Values
Core Values: Integrity, Professionalism and Respect for Diversity.
Education
Advanced university degree (Masters or equivalent) in social sciences, especially in sociology, social work or psychology.
Work Experience
At least 10 years experience in a multinational environment dealing with counseling and welfare programmes. Advanced knowledge in various fields such as employee assistance programmes, allowances and benefits and social welfare is required. Knowledge of the UN rules, regulations and working practices is an advantage.
Other Skills:
The incumbent must have the sensitivity to varied cultural, social and human values. Familiarity with financial, social and educational conditions at duty station. Utmost discretion.
Languages
English and French are the working Languages of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). For the post advertised, fluency in spoken and written English and French is required; knowledge of a third language would be an advantage.
United Nations Considerations
The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs. (Charter of the United Nations - Chapter 3, article 8). The United Nations Secretariat is a non-smoking environment.
Assessment Method
Candidate will be evaluated based on the eligibility criteria and competency-based interview.
Special Notice
Extension of the appointment is subject to Extension of the mandate and/or the availability of the funds.
No Fee
THE UNITED NATIONS DOES NOT CHARGE A FEE AT ANY STAGE OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS (APPLICATION, INTERVIEW MEETING, PROCESSING, OR TRAINING). THE UNITED NATIONS DOES NOT CONCERN ITSELF WITH INFORMATION ON APPLICANTS' BANK ACCOUNTS.

The Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI)
Closing date: 14 Jun 2011
Location: United Republic of Tanzania (the) - Dar es Salaam
Overview:
The Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI - formerly the Clinton HIV/AIDS Initiative) under the leadership of former President William Jefferson Clinton III has worked since 2002 to reduce the pricing of HIV/AIDS medicines and tests, and to work with governments around the world to further turn the tide on the disease by building the systems needed to deliver care and treatment.
In seven short years, President Clinton and the Clinton HIV/AIDS Initiative have made a substantial impact in the fight against HIV/AIDS. This includes seven breakthrough price reductions for drugs and diagnostics. Today, more than two million people living with HIV/AIDS are on lifesaving treatment using medicines purchased under CHAI agreements with manufacturers. This includes two out of every three children who are on HIV/AIDS treatment. CHAI's greatest work is as a trusted partner to national governments whose efforts have made possible tremendous gains in HIV/AIDS services and public health.
In addition to programs focused on HIV/AIDS, CHAI has expanded in recent years to assist efforts to fight malaria, lowering the prices and improving access to malaria medicines. CHAI has also worked with a number of governments on improving the underlying systems needed to deliver comprehensive health care. Given CHAI's expansion and growth, on December 10th, President Clinton announced that the Clinton HIV/AIDS Initiative will become the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI). Since 1 January 2010, it became a separate non-profit organization under President Clinton's leadership as chairman of the board of directors. This change recognizes the expanded role CHAI has played for some time in strengthening health systems broadly while still playing a leading role in HIV/AIDS.
CHAI's collaboration with the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania started in 2003 when a team of volunteers with business and public health expertise to elaborate a business plan for HIV/AIDS Care and Treatment. This was then adopted by the Tanzanian Cabinet to be the national Care and Treatment Plan 2003-2008. This marked the beginning of a very successful partnership that saw CHAI become a close and trusted partner of the MOHSW. In the 7 year collaboration CHAI supported the MOHSW to initiate and successfully implement very challenging initiatives such as the:

• The National care and Treatment Plan (NCTP) 2003-2008.
  
  

• The Mkapa Fellows Programme to recruit, train and deploy health workers to rural districts with severe shortage of human resource for health.
  
  

• The rural initiative for HIV/AIDS Care and Treatment to provide access to ART for people living in areas
  
  

• Expanding access to pediatric HIV/AIDS care and treatment through commodity donations (UNITAID) and programmatic technical support
  
  

• Scaling up universal coverage of Prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) using more efficacious regimen recommended by WHO instead of the less effective single dose nevirapine (sdNVP).
  
  

• Piloting a subsidy for effective malaria treatment using artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) in the private sector.
  
  

The success of CHAI in Tanzania is partly though its ability to work with the MOHSW at the national level to address policy and strategic issues while at the same time supporting to build capacity of local government health authorities to implement and/or sustainably scaling up these initiatives.
Based in Dar es Salaam, the Director of Programs will work with the Country Director and CHAI staff to ensure the overall success of the CHAI in Tanzania. The Director of Programs will help coordinate and support CHAI's team on the ground to achieve the Program's objectives, and forge stronger relations with the Ministry of Health, other government agencies and partners.
Responsibilities:

• Oversee all aspects of program management including planning , budgeting, implementation and reporting
  
  

• Oversee and coordinate Program Manager functions of program staff Managing and problem solving
  
  

• Provide strategic and managerial program direction and oversight to programs, with technical orientation from Program Directors/Managers; support CHAI's programmatic teams to achieve program objectives
  
  

• Plan and execute specific programmatic initiatives, as well as support the team in doing so
  
  

• Ensure program implementation and reporting is in accordance with grant procedures and specifications
  
  

• Work closely with Program Directors and Managers Team to ensure timely oversight of project activities with partner organizations. This includes adhering to deadlines, ensuring that deliverables are drafted and submitted in a timely fashion, support the drafting of deliverables and act as the linkage between donor communications and technical Program Directors/Managers
  
  

• Help establish and achieve aggressive operational program milestones
  
  

• Provide high-quality technical assistance to the government as needed/requested, often under a short timeframe
  
  

• Maintain a thorough understanding of the HIV/AIDS, malaria, TB landscape and overall health systems priorities and gaps throughout the country
  
  

Qualifications:

• Comfortable in a peer relationship with government officials
  
  

• Ability to navigate complex government processes with multiple influencers, and at negotiating and achieving consensus
  
  

• Proficiency with working on highly complex problems without extensive structural or operational support from HQ
  
  

• Great mentor, manager, role model and team player who demands 100% performance from self and entire team; willing to micro-manage as required
  
  

• Seasoned operator who knows how to get things done - on time and on budget
  
  

• Strong analytical skills, quantitative and qualitative
  
  

• Ability to work within budgetary constraints typical in a small foundation;
  
  

• Knowledge of HIV/AIDS desired (but not required)
  
  

• Knowledge of local language and culture preferred but not necessary
  
  

• Excellent business-oriented oral and written communication skills
  
  

Education/Experience:

• A minimum of 5 years experience in private or public sector enterprise, with increasing levels of responsibility and leadership
  
  

• Experience conceiving, planning and executing programs or projects with documented results
  
  

• Excellent business-oriented oral and written communication skills
  
  

• Master's Degree (preferably in Business or Public Health) is strongly preferred
  
  

How to apply
APPLY HERE: https://careers-chai.icims.com/jobs/1912/job
Reference Code: RW_8EXSP2-66

Location : Dar es Salaam,
Application Deadline : 21-Mar-11
Type of Contract : Individual Contract
Post Level : International Consultant
Languages Required : English
Duration of Initial Contract : 25 days

Background
The Pangani River Basin drains Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Meru in northern Tanzania and flows to the Indian Ocean in the town of Pangani in Tanga Region. The Pangani Basin has an estimated population of 3.7 million people, most of whom rely, either directly or indirectly, on agriculture for their livelihoods. The River and its Basin are greatly important to Tanzania, in terms of hydro-power, irrigation, fisheries, livestock etc. Irrigated agriculture in the basin (estimated as 30,000 to 40,000 ha) forms a significant contribution to Tanzania?s food security and supports almost 3 million livelihoods.

Currently there is not enough water to meet the demand in the Pangani Basin, yet the Pangani Basin Water Board continues to receive requests for new water permits from local, municipal and industrial investors. Climate change and reducing water supplies had yet to be taken into consideration in the allocation process. Conflicts are also emerging between various water users, such as commercial farms, small farmers and livestock keepers. The natural environment has yet to be recognized as an important water user and at present receives hardly any consideration in an already over-allocated resource.

The Government of Tanzania, IUCN, through its Water & Nature Initiative (WANI), European Union (EU) and the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) through UNDP have been committed to prepare water users and water managers in the Pangani Basin for reducing water supplies through the Pangani River Basin Management Project. The Project aims at mainstreaming the negative impacts of climate change into Integrated Water Resources Management in the Pangani River Basin, in order to support the equitable provision of freshwater for the environment and for livelihoods for future generations.
The project started its implementation in July 2006 and is executed by the Pangani Basin Water Board. The Pangani Basin Water Office, with technical support from IUCN ESARO under a special agreement form an Implementation entity through the Project Management Unit - PMU based at the Basin Office. Other partners are SNV and local NGO Pamoja. The project is funded by the Government of Tanzania, IUCN, UNDP/GEF and EU.

Project objective

The objective of the project is to prepare water managers and users for changing climatic conditions (especially reduced flows) through the provision of technical data, planning, and improved allocation, capacity building and awareness-raising. The project focuses on the following three technical areas:

* Understanding current and future climatic vulnerability (in the broadest sense of the term): developing and using information for equitable water allocation in a changing hydrological regime
* Negotiated outcomes to minimize future climatic vulnerability and future climatic risk: Continuing dialogues towards sustainable water resources management
* Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in the water sector: national linkages and lessons learned.

The three technical outputs would lead to a single measurable outcome: Management and allocation of water in Pangani Basin includes climate change preparation and adaptation and environmental considerations in a sound Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) framework. It is one of the first field-based climate change preparation projects in Eastern Africa with strong links to basin and national planning and policy, and as such builds national and regional capacity, provide lessons and serve as a national and regional demonstration site.

The assessment of the project impacts and achievements during the implementation period and the extraction of lessons learned both in terms of financial and technical approaches, require a proper evaluation of the project achievements and to measure the improvements or changes in the designed indicators, as a result of the project implementation, compared to the base line parameters. A set of indicators were identified during development of Monitoring and Evaluation framework for this project.

The project is seeking the services of two qualified experts (an international and a national) to conduct the terminal evaluation of the project. The consultants will assess the project achievements and impacts, in consultation with the main project stakeholders. The consultants will work very closely with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and the Pangani Basin Water Office in Moshi, the Ministry of water and Irrigation, the UNDP Country Office, the UNDP/GEF Technical Regional Office in Pretoria, IUCN, SNV and Pamoja. The consultants will be contracted by UNDP Country Office and, the Team Leader will report to the Deputy Country Director (DCD) programme with technical support from Energy & Environment Unit. UNDP/GEF Technical Regional Office will be responsible for quality assurance. Any support required and relevant documents will be provided as necessary to the consultants.

The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) policy at the project level in UNDP/GEF has four objectives: i) to monitor and evaluate results and impacts; ii) to provide a basis for decision making on necessary amendments and improvements; iii) to promote accountability for resource use; and iii) to document, provide feedback on, and disseminate lessons learned. A mix of tools is used to ensure effective project M&E. These might be applied continuously throughout the lifetime of the project ? e.g. periodic monitoring of indicators -, or as specific time-bound exercises such as mid-term reviews, audit reports and final evaluations.

In accordance with UNDP/GEF M&E policies and procedures, all regular and medium-sized projects supported by the GEF should undergo a final evaluation upon completion of implementation. A final evaluation of a GEF-funded project (or previous phase) is required before a concept proposal for additional funding (or subsequent phases of the same project) can be considered for inclusion in a GEF work program. However, a final evaluation is not an appraisal of the follow-up phase.

Final evaluations are intended to assess the relevance, performance and success of the project. It looks at early signs of potential impact and sustainability of results, including the contribution to capacity development and the achievement of global environmental goals. It will also identify/document lessons learned and make recommendations that might improve design and implementation of other UNDP/GEF projects.

Duties and Responsibilities
The main objective of this evaluation is to provide the project partners i.e. GEF, UNDP, GoT, IUCN, and the community with an independent assessment of the key achievements of the project as compared to the objectives and outcomes reflected in the project document for the three years implementation period of the project. Assess the project expected outcomes and their sustainability and suitability for policy related review inputs and best practices for community adaptation. The evaluation results are envisaged to identify and discuss the lessons learned, through measurements of the changes in the set indicators, summarize the experiences gained and technical achievements, and recommend future policy dialogues.

TASK AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
The scope of the evaluation will cover the success in mainstreaming climate change adaptation options in the Pangani River Basin. It will assess the achievement of the project in generating information for water managers to enhance water allocation in the basin, community water resources management strategies and information sharing among key partners and stakeholders in the water sector.

The following represents the minimum coverage of points to be included, but the evaluation should be adapted to specific concerns and issues that may be raised:

The mission will assess the

* Relevance of the project in terms of current development priorities and needs.
* Clarity and realism of the project's development and immediate objectives, including specification of targets and identification of beneficiaries and prospects for sustainability.

Quality, clarity and adequacy of project design including

* Clarity and logical consistency between, inputs, activities, outputs and progress towards achievement of objectives (quality, quantity and time-frame);
* Realism and clarity in the specification of prior obligations and prerequisites (assumptions and risks);
* Realism and clarity of external institutional relationships, and in the managerial and institutional framework for implementation and the work plan;
* Likely cost-effectiveness of the project design.

Efficiency and adequacy of project implementation including

* Availability of funds as compared with budget for both GEF and nationally funded components (i.e. track co-financing);
* The quality and timeliness of input delivery by partners
* Managerial and work efficiency;
* Implementation difficulties;
* Adequacy of monitoring and reporting;
* The extent of national support and commitment and
* The quality and quantity of administrative and technical support.

Project results, including a full and systematic assessment of output produced to date (quantity and quality as compared with the work plan and progress towards achieving the objectives)
After the termination of the project. The mission should examine in particular:

* The degree to which project outputs have been defined based on adequate consultation with potential product users, and used and internalised by the national focal point institutions;
* The outcomes of the consultation processes used by the project;
* The scope for uptake by other related initiatives in the region.

Review the clarity of roles and responsibilities of the various agencies and institutions and the level of coordination and efficiency of partnership between relevant stakeholders. In particular look at the roles of the Project team, PBWB, PBWO, Pamoja, district authorities, SNV, IUCN, UNDP, EU, VPO-DOE and MOW.
Assess the level of stakeholder involvement in the project from community to higher Government levels and recommend on whether this involvement has been appropriate to the achieving goals of the project.
Describe and assess efforts of UNDP (CO and UNDP-GEF) in support of the implementation.
Review donor partnership processes, and the contribution of co-finance.
Examine the potential of scaling up and replication of good practices from the project outcomes, identifying how will it be financed and, who will be responsible for financing and implementation.
Based on the GEF evaluation procedure, provide rating for each project outcome indicating at what level has been achieved.

Based on the above analysis the mission will draw specific conclusions and make proposals for any necessary further action by Governments, GEF, and/or UNDP and other partners, including any need for additional assistance and activities by the project prior to closure. The mission will draw attention to any lessons of general interest.Any proposal for further assistance should include precise specification of objectives and the major suggested inputs, outputs and outcomes.

METHODOLOGY
The terminal evaluation will be conducted in a participatory manner through a combination of processes including a review of the key project documentation, interview with project stakeholders and site visit as deemed necessary. It will include visits to UNDP Country Office, Project Executing Office/PIU, Pangani Basin Water Office, Ministry of Water Irrigation, VPO-DoE, IUCN, EU, SNV, Pamoja as well as selected national partners and stakeholders, including interviews with key individuals both within the project, government staff, NGOs, private sector and project beneficiaries mainly communities and water user associations. The following documents are recommended to be reviewed by the team:

* Project Document
* Project implementation reports (APR/PIR's);
* Annual technical reports and work plans of the various implementation task teams;
* Mid Term Evaluation report, and
* Minutes of the project Steering Committee Meetings
* Reports of the studies undertaken by the project such as EFA report, Vulnerability Assessment report, etc.

EXPECTED OUTPUTS
The consultants shall provide the project partners and the PIU with a comprehensive report with the following:

* Impacts and key project achievements identified and documented according to the project indicators;
* Project achievements and sustainability in relation to the project design;
* Relevance of the project achievements and the national policy development agenda;
* Efficiency and effectiveness of the project in terms of financial and planned activities;
* Project shortcomings and lesson learned and policy review for integrating climate change adaptation in the water policy and IWRM;
* Clear and specific recommendations for future follow-up addressed to the stakeholders in the project.

Outline for the Final Report

Executive summary

* Brief description of project
* Context and purpose of the evaluation
* Overall rating of project performance against objective and outcome as well as project implementation, main conclusions, recommendations and lessons learned.

Introduction

* Purpose of the evaluation
* Key issues addressed
* Methodology of the evaluation
* Structure of the evaluation.

The project(s) and its development context

* Project start and its duration
* Problems that the project seeks to address
* Immediate and development objectives of the project
* Main stakeholders
* Results expected.

Findings and Conclusions

In addition to a descriptive assessment, all criteria marked with (R) should be ratedusing the following UNDP/GEF six-point rating scale: Highly Satisfactory (HS), Satisfactory (S), Marginally Satisfactory (MS), Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU), Unsatisfactory (U), Highly Unsatisfactory (HU).

Project Formulation

* Conceptualization/Design (R). This should assess the approach used in design and an appreciation of the appropriateness of problem conceptualization and whether the selected intervention strategy addressed the root causes and principal threats in the project area. It should also include an assessment of the logical framework and whether the different project components and activities proposed to achieve the objective were appropriate, viable and responded to contextual institutional, legal and regulatory settings of the project. It should also assess the indicators defined for guiding implementation and measurement of achievement and whether lessons from other relevant projects (e.g., same focal area) were incorporated into project design.
* Country-ownership/Driveness. Assess the extent to which the project idea/conceptualization had its origin within national, sectoral and development plans and focuses on national environment and development interests.
*
Stakeholder participation (R) Assess information dissemination, consultation, and ?stakeholder? participation in design stages.
*
Replication approach. Determine the ways in which lessons and experiences coming out of the project were/are to be replicated or scaled-up in the design and implementation of other projects (this is also related to actual practices undertaken during implementation).
*
Other aspects to assess in the review of Project formulation approaches would be UNDP comparative advantage as IA for this project; the consideration of linkages between projects and other interventions within the sector and the definition of clear and appropriate management arrangements at the design stag

Project Implementation

*
An overall rating of project implementation employing the six-point rating scale (HS, S, MS, MU, U, HU) should be provided by the review.

Implementation Approach (R). This should include assessments of the following aspects:

* The use of the logical framework as a management tool during implementation and any changes made to this as a response to changing conditions and/or feedback from M and E activities if required.
* Other elements that indicate adaptive management such as comprehensive and realistic work plans routinely developed that reflect adaptive management and/or; changes in management arrangements to enhance implementation.
* The project's use/establishment of electronic information technologies to support implementation, participation and monitoring, as well as other project activities.
* The general operational relationships between the institutions involved and others and how these relationships have contributed to effective implementation and achievement of project objectives.
* Technical capacities associated with the project and their role in project development, management and achievements.

Monitoring and evaluation (R). Including an assessment as to whether there has been adequate periodic oversight of activities during implementation to establish the extent to which inputs, work schedules, other required actions and outputs are proceeding according to plan; whether formal evaluations have been held and whether action has been taken on the results of this monitoring oversight and evaluation reports.

Stakeholder participation (R). This should include assessments of the mechanisms for information dissemination in project implementation and the extent of stakeholder participation in management, emphasizing the following:

*
The production and dissemination of information generated by the project.
*
Local resource users and NGOs participation in project implementation and decision making and an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the approach adopted by the project in this arena.
*
The establishment of partnerships and collaborative relationships developed by the project with local, national and international entities and the effects they have had on project implementation.
*
Involvement of governmental institutions in project implementation, the extent of governmental support of the project.

Financial Planning: Including an assessment of:

The actual project cost by objectives, outputs, activities
The cost-effectiveness of achievements
Financial management (including disbursement issues)
Co-financing

Sustainability. Extent to which the benefits of the project will continue, within or outside the project domain, after it has come to an end. Relevant factors include for example:?development of a sustainability strategy, establishment of financial and economic instruments and mechanisms, mainstreaming project objectives into the economy or community production activities.

Execution and implementation modalities. This should consider the effectiveness of the UNDP counterpart and Project Co-ordination Unit participation in selection, recruitment, assignment of experts, consultants and national counterpart staff members and in the definition of tasks and responsibilities; quantity, quality and timeliness of inputs for the project with respect to execution responsibilities, enactment of necessary legislation and budgetary provisions and extent to which these may have affected implementation and sustainability of the Project; quality and timeliness of inputs by UNDP and the government, and other parties responsible for providing inputs to the project, and the extent to which this may have affected the smooth implementation of the project.

Results
Attainment of Outcomes/ Achievement of objectives (R): Including a description and rating (employing the six-point rating scale) of the extent to which the project's objectives (environmental and developmental) were achieved using Highly Satisfactory (HS), Satisfactory (S), Marginally Satisfactory (MS), Marginally Satisfactory (MS), Unsatisfactory (U) and Highly Unsatisfactory (HU)ratings. If the project did not establish a baseline (initial conditions), the evaluators should seek to determine it through the use of special methodologies so that achievements, results and impacts can be properly established.

This section should also include reviews of the following:

* Sustainability: Including an appreciation of the extent to which benefits continue, within or outside the project domain after GEF assistance/external assistance in this phase has come to an end.
* Contribution to upgrading skills of the national staff

Recommendations:

* Corrective actions for the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation
* Actions to follow up or reinforce initial benefits from the project
* Proposal for future directions underlining major objectives

Lessons learned

This should highlight the best practices and poor practices in addressing issues relating to relevance, performance and success.

Evaluation report Annexes

*
Evaluation TORs
*
Itinerary
*
List of persons interviewed
*
Summary of field visits
*
List of documents reviewed
*
Questionnaire used and summary of results
*
Comments by stakeholders (only in case of discrepancies with evaluation findings and conclusions)


EXECUTION ARRANGEMENTS
The two consultants should work together as a team towards producing the evaluation report. The national consultant will be responsible for providing any necessary background information and preparation of the agreed parts of the report. The international consultant will be accountable for the timely submission of required outputs and submission of the deliverables, including the final report.
The consultants will be contracted and supervised by the UNDP Country Office in consultation with the GEF Regional Office. The PIU shall arrange for the consultants all necessary site visits and meetings in the project site according to the TOR. UNDP country Office in coordination with the PIU shall arrange logistics for the mission including hotel reservation and transportation during the mission. The mission will maintain close liaison with UNDP CO, Pangani Basin Water Office, IUCN as well as the PIU.

TIME FRAME
The evaluation will be carried out through a period of 25 working days, which includes a 15-day mission to Tanzania, including field visit in the project site.
DELIVERABLES
Submit 5 hard and soft copies of draft report after two weeks
Submit 5 hard copies and 1 soft copy of the final report.

REPORT ANNEXES

* TORs
* Itinerary
* List of persons interviewed
* List of documents reviewed

Competencies

Two consultants are proposed to conduct the evaluation exercise: an international and a national consultant. The International Consultant, who will also serve as team leader and, shall be widely experienced and suitably qualified with regard to basin management and institutional issues and will be finally responsible for the product desired.

The National Consultant shall have experience and conversant with nation policy development. S/he should be well acquainted with general water sector situation of Tanzania, in particular overall water sector development strategies and programmes. Knowledge and experience in climate change adaptation and in particular impacts of climate change in water resources is a must.

Required Skills and Experience
Education: International Consultant:

* Master Degree or PhD in Water Resources Management, hydro-meteorology, Engineering, Naturals Sciences, Natural Resources management/Environment, or related fields

Experience:

* A minimum of 10 years working in the climate and water resources related aspects or relevant sector with experience in climate change. Extensive experience in the fields of project formulation, execution, Monitoring and Evaluation is required. Previous involvement and understanding of UNDP's procedures is an advantage. The consultant should have strong writing skills coupled with relevant experience in results-based monitoring and evaluation techniques.

National Consultant:

* Post-graduate qualifications preferably in Engineering, water resources management, Environment Sciences, Economics, and development studies with experience in upstream-downstream policies.

Experience:

* At least 7 years of relevant technical experience in Monitoring and Evaluation.

Language:

* Fluency in English and Kiswahili, and possess strong technical writing skills.

Use the link below to Apply

https://jobs.undp.org/cj_apply.cfm?job_id=22179

UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.